Scholar Feed
Rank CS/AI/ML papers by citations, forecast impact, or code adoption; trace 23.2M citation edges.
Community: Submitted by a user or imported; check the owner before granting accessOnlineNo sign-inGlobalFreeRead-only
What it can do
What data it sees
Do you need an account
No: the server works without sign-in
Rank CS/AI/ML papers by citations, forecast impact, or code adoption; trace 23.2M citation edges.
Server tool list (27)
Raw names from tools/list. Only developers need these.
| search_papers | Search Scholar Feed's 600k+ CS/AI/ML paper corpus. Semantic (embedding) search by default, so it finds conceptually related work even when the wording differs. EVERY PARAMETER DOCUMENTS ITS OWN BEHAVIOUR AND COVERAGE LIMITS — read the ones you intend to use; this description covers only what no single parameter can tell you. RETRIEVAL LIMIT: semantic ranking favours recent, stylistically-matched papers and routinely MISSES the old high-citation anchor of a field (H2O for KV eviction, GRIT for unified embedding+generation). To reach a field's canonical work, read the top-5 abstracts for repeated baseline mentions ('we compare against X') and look that name up directly, or call get_foundational_lineage. THREE UNRELATED NOTIONS OF IMPACT, easily confused: proven citations (sort='impactful', min_citations) | a ~90-day forecast percentile that is NULL on older papers and therefore excludes them (sort='trending', impact_min) | GitHub adoption (sort='community', min_stars). YOUR LIBRARY IS MARKED INLINE on authenticated calls: each hit carries is_saved and is_read, and a hit you previously annotated carries note_text — your own earlier verdict. Read note_text INSTEAD of re-deriving a conclusion from the abstract; re-judging a paper you already ruled on is the most common way an agent wastes a research session. is_saved=false is a real measurement; on anonymous calls these keys are absent entirely, so never read a missing is_saved as false. Papers new to you are ranked exactly as before — nothing is demoted for being unseen. |
| get_paper | Get full details for one or more papers by arXiv ID. Pass a single-element array for one paper; pass multiple IDs to batch-fetch up to 50 papers in one call. Pass format='bibtex' to get a .bib citation entry (bibtex is single-paper only; for multi-paper bibtex, call repeatedly). Default returns a lean 13-field shape (arxiv_id, title, authors, year, categories, has_code, github_url, citation_count, venue_name, llm_summary, llm_significance, llm_novelty_score, impact_pct — where impact_pct is the ML-forecast impact percentile 0-100 computed WITHIN the paper's own arXiv-category cohort, so it is a cohort-relative rank rather than an absolute score, and is NULL on older papers outside the recent ~90-day scoring window). Pass verbose=true for the full shape with structured extraction (method_name, contribution_type, task_category, datasets, baselines) and institution_tags. Use fields='arxiv_id,title,abstract' to select an exact subset, or fetch_fulltext with sections='all' for the full paper. |
| get_citations | Get the citation graph for a paper, sorted by citing-paper rank_score (highest-impact first). 'citing' = outgoing references this paper cites; 'cited_by' = incoming citations from other papers. Default response is a lean 12-field shape per paper — pass verbose=true for the full 28-field shape. |
| fetch_fulltext | Extract paper content from an arXiv paper's LaTeX source, falling back to PDF text. Two modes: 'results' (default) returns ~800 chars of results/experiments + up to 3 table captions — lean, ideal for checking a reported number. 'all' returns full paper sections (abstract, introduction, related work, method, results, conclusion) at up to 3000 chars each + 5 table captions, ~15KB, so prefer 'results' unless you need the whole paper. Content is available for ~95% of arXiv papers; a 404 means neither LaTeX nor PDF extraction yielded text. May take a few seconds. |
| find_author | Two-mode author tool. Provide exactly one of q or id. Q-MODE (q=...): search for researchers by topic or name — uses embedding similarity for topics ('efficient LLM inference'), fuzzy matching for names ('Yann LeCun'). Returns a list of matching authors with author_id, name, h_index, total_papers, primary_field, research_topics. ID-MODE (id=...): look up a single author profile by author_id (obtained from a previous q-mode call or from co_author_graph results). Returns h-index, total citations, global rank, primary field, novelty score distribution, research topics, code/venue scores, years active, and their top 10 papers by rank score. |
| co_author_graph | Find the co-authorship neighborhood of one or more authors. Given a list of author_ids, returns edges {from, to, papers_count, last_collab_year} where 'from' is one of the input authors and 'to' is any co-author appearing on a shared paper within the window. Use for AC reviewer triage (find conflicts), disambiguating researchers (who do they actually work with?), or expanding an author seed into a research community. window_years defaults to 10. Result is capped at 500 edges, sorted by papers_count DESC. |
| embed_text | Embed a text string into a 768-dim Gemini Flash vector. Use for HyDE-style retrieval: (1) write a hypothetical short paper that would perfectly answer the user's query, (2) embed it with task_type='RETRIEVAL_DOCUMENT' (default — matches the corpus embedding side), (3) pass the resulting embedding back through search-style tools to find real papers nearest to the hypothetical. task_type='RETRIEVAL_QUERY' matches the query side and is useful for direct user-query embedding without HyDE. Pro-only — requires an SF_API_KEY on a Pro account; anonymous and free callers get a 403 pro_required. Cost: ~$0.0001/call; rate-limited at 30/minute per API key. |
| get_field_orientation | Returns CANDIDATE FOUNDATIONAL PAPERS for a research topic — cheap retrieval only, no synthesis. Ranks papers by a blend of citation count (0.6 weight, captures importance) and semantic similarity to your topic (0.4 weight). Use this to bootstrap a literature survey or get a fast sense of the landscape. For a synthesized orientation report (key concepts, open problems, reading order), use the /field-guide skill which calls this tool internally. Does not require a Pro API key — no LLM calls are made. |
| get_foundational_lineage | Returns the FOUNDATIONAL WORK FOR A PAPER'S NICHE via the citation graph — the relative question ('what is foundational for THIS paper's specific sub-field', often itself only modestly cited) rather than the obvious global landmarks. Anchors on the paper, takes its embedding neighbourhood as the niche, and ranks what the niche cites into three tiers: `niche_roots` (the niche-specific foundations, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on them — surfaces canonical anchors that semantic search misses), `field_level` (broader secondary foundations), and `discipline` (universal landmarks like Attention Is All You Need, collapsed out of the way). Each paper carries `cited_by_in_niche` evidence so the claim is grounded, not asserted. Use this to trace prior art / lineage for a paper, or to find the canonical methods a niche is built on. Complements get_field_orientation (which is topic-anchored and retrieval-only). No Pro key and no LLM calls required. |
| save_paper | Save a paper to the authenticated user's Scholar Feed library (bookmark). MUTATES the library and feeds the user's personalization — saved papers are the strongest signal in the For You feed and the email digest. Idempotent: calling it again on an already-saved paper leaves it saved. Requires SF_API_KEY. To file it into a named collection in one step, use add_to_collection (that also saves). |
| unsave_paper | Remove a paper from the authenticated user's Scholar Feed library. MUTATES the library. Idempotent: removing a paper that isn't saved leaves it unsaved. Note: the saved library is a superset of all collections, so un-saving a paper ALSO removes it from every collection it was in. To keep it filed in a collection, use remove_from_collection instead (that leaves the paper saved). Requires SF_API_KEY. |
| like_paper | Like a paper — a 'more like this' calibration signal that tunes the user's For You feed toward similar work. INSERT-only and idempotent (liking twice is a no-op, never un-likes). Distinct from save_paper: like expresses taste for ranking; save bookmarks for later reading. Requires SF_API_KEY. |
| list_library | List the authenticated user's saved papers (their library), newest first. Read-only. Use this to review a reading list or to see what's already saved before saving more. Requires SF_API_KEY. SHAPE: agent callers get a lean record — `llm_summary` (~300 chars) INSTEAD of the abstract, with empty fields omitted rather than sent as null. Each paper also carries the state that makes this a knowledge base rather than a bookmark list: `note_text` (the user's own recorded verdict, when one exists), `is_read`, and `collections` (the axes it is filed under, e.g. 'AgentOPA/G4'). READ note_text FIRST. A paper carrying one was already judged in an earlier session — use that verdict instead of re-reading the paper and re-deriving it. If it is missing, consider recording one with annotate_paper so the next session inherits your conclusion. Pass verbose=true (or fields=...) only when you genuinely need the abstract or the full 28-field shape; the default is ~4x smaller and is the right choice for surveying what you already have. |
| list_collections | List the authenticated user's collections (named groups of saved papers) with paper counts. Read-only. Use before add_to_collection to see existing collections. Requires SF_API_KEY. |
| create_collection | Create a new named collection. MUTATES. If a collection with that name already exists, returns the existing one (get-or-create — never errors on duplicate). Use "/" to nest under a folder, e.g. "AgentOPA/Formal" — the folder is derived from the name, so there is no parent to create first. Requires SF_API_KEY. |
| add_to_collection | Add a paper to a collection, addressed by collection_id OR collection_name (get-or-create by name — no need to look up an id first). Nest with "/": collection_name "AgentOPA/Formal" files the paper under an "AgentOPA" folder. MUTATES: also auto-saves the paper to the library. Idempotent (adding a paper already in the collection is a no-op). Requires SF_API_KEY. |
| remove_from_collection | Remove a paper from a collection, addressed by collection_id OR collection_name. MUTATES (the paper stays in your library; it's only removed from this collection). Idempotent. Requires SF_API_KEY. |
| create_watch | Create a standing watch — evaluated daily against newly-indexed papers, surfacing new matches via the email digest and via check_watches. MUTATES. Get-or-create by name (re-creating with an existing name returns it unchanged — never errors on duplicate). TWO forms: (1) the v2 STRUCTURED filter via `criteria` (collections/authors/categories/text/has_code/min_novelty/similar, AND-composed) — the composable, agent-tunable form, recommended; tune it with preview_watch first, and edit later with update_watch. Structured watches rank by 'rising' (forecasted breakout impact) by default, and tighten with min_impact_pct for an anti-noise watch that surfaces only the breakout papers in your niche. (2) a single legacy seed selector (q OR collection_name OR collection_id OR anchor_paper_id); if `criteria` is given it takes precedence. Requires SF_API_KEY. |
| list_watches | List the authenticated user's watches with name, a one-line definition summary, last_evaluated_at, and pending_hits (count of new matches since the last digest delivery). Read-only. Use before create_watch to see what's already tracked. Requires SF_API_KEY. |
| check_watches | Pull new matching papers since the last digest delivery, in the same shape as search_papers results. Optionally scope to one watch by watch_name OR watch_id; omit both for all watches. Read-only and idempotent — does NOT advance any watermark (only digest delivery does), so it is safe to call repeatedly (no mark-on-read). This is the in-session 'anything new on my watches?' pull. Requires SF_API_KEY. |
| delete_watch | Delete a watch, addressed by watch_id OR name. MUTATES. Idempotent: deleting a non-existent watch is a no-op (no error). To change a watch in place (rename / novelty_min / retarget criteria) use update_watch instead of delete-and-recreate. Requires SF_API_KEY. |
| update_watch | Update an existing watch in place — rename, change novelty_min, or RETARGET its structured filter `criteria`. MUTATES. Address by watch_id OR name. Changing criteria replaces the definition and clears the watch's pending hits (so stale matches don't deliver); the next daily eval repopulates. Structured watches rank by 'rising' (forecasted breakout impact) by default, and tighten with min_impact_pct for an anti-noise watch that surfaces only the breakout papers in your niche. Tune the new criteria with preview_watch first. Requires SF_API_KEY. |
| preview_watch | Dry-run a structured filter over recent papers WITHOUT creating a watch — the tuning loop. Returns {window_days, needs_similarity, match_count, sample} so you can iterate (add a category, raise min_novelty, switch the collection relation) before saving with create_watch. Structured watches rank by 'rising' (forecasted breakout impact) by default, and tighten with min_impact_pct for an anti-noise watch that surfaces only the breakout papers in your niche. NOTE: for a similarity filter, match_count is capped at 200 (the cosine fetch window) and so saturates at 200 on broad/hot topics — tune by the `sample` scores and narrow with categories/min_novelty (or a higher similar floor) rather than relying on match_count alone. Read-only. Requires SF_API_KEY. |
| find_gaps | Find important work you HAVEN'T saved, for a collection or topic — a 'what am I missing?' analysis. Returns two buckets: foundational_gaps (canonical citation-graph anchors in the niche, not in your library) and frontier_gaps (recent high-novelty work in the niche, not yet saved). Provide exactly one seed: collection_name OR collection_id OR topic. The backend derives the niche, runs lineage + recent-novelty search, and subtracts your saved set. Read-only. Requires SF_API_KEY (it needs your library to subtract) and is a Pro feature — free accounts receive an upgrade prompt. |
| ask_library | Answer a question using ONLY the papers you've saved — a synthesis over your library (or one collection) with inline [arXiv-ID] citations. The inverse of find_gaps (which finds important work you're MISSING): ask_library reasons over what you HAVE. Optionally scope to one collection (collection_name OR collection_id); omit both to use your whole library. Read-only. Requires SF_API_KEY (it reads your saved set). Free accounts get 1 question/month; Pro raises this to 200/day. |
| annotate_paper | Record YOUR verdict on a paper — why it matters for your work, when to use it, or why you ruled it out. One note per paper, upserted (writing again replaces it), so it is safe to call repeatedly. Requires SF_API_KEY. WHY IT MATTERS: this note is the only thing that survives between sessions. list_library returns note_text on every saved paper, so a verdict written now is what a future session reads INSTEAD of re-reading the paper and re-deriving the same conclusion. WRITE A JUDGMENT, NOT A SUMMARY — the paper already carries llm_summary and an abstract, so restating what the paper says adds nothing. Write what those cannot: how it bears on YOUR problem. Prefer a claim someone could later prove wrong ("needs a labeled trace log we don't have", "our baseline — beat this on the 7B setting") over an unfalsifiable verdict ("interesting", "not very relevant"), because a mechanism can be re-checked when circumstances change and a sentiment cannot. State the basis when it is thin: a verdict formed from the abstract alone deserves "(abstract only)", since fetch_fulltext defaults to ~800 characters of the results section rather than the whole paper. Pass action='get' to read the existing note before overwriting it — worth doing when a prior session may already have judged this paper. To correct a note, just write the corrected text (it replaces). |
| check_drift | Answers 'for my problem, is the method I use superseded — and by what?' over a grounded, entity-resolved knowledge base of textual critique receipts + benchmark-dominance edges (no LLM call at query time). Call with a `family` (e.g. 'rag', 'peft', 'kvcache') and a `method` (e.g. 'SnapKV', 'LoRA') to get a verdict: how superseded it is, WHO critiques it (verbatim quotes + the citing paper), WHO beats it on benchmarks (winner, numbers, condition, source paper), and the not-yet-superseded alternatives in the same sub-problem. Omit `method` to get the whole-family map: most-superseded baselines, competition sub-problems, and the live frontier. Method names are matched case- and spacing-insensitively, with did-you-mean suggestions on a miss. Use this when choosing or reviewing a technique for a known problem area, or to check whether a baseline a paper relies on has been beaten. Does not require a Pro API key. Covers ~10 builder-problem families and growing; the `family` parameter lists them, or pass family='list' for the live set. Coverage caveat: evidence is drawn only from arXiv benchmark tables, so 'superseded' means a method was beaten in a published comparison (not that it is dead or unusable), production frameworks (LangChain, LlamaIndex, etc.) appear only as baselines and never as winners, and results are a literature signal rather than a deployment recommendation. GROUNDING — how far to trust an individual receipt: every claim passes a deterministic gate against the source paper's raw LaTeX (a critique must carry a verbatim quote shingle found in the source; a benchmark edge must have every one of its numbers present there), so a fabricated quote or table cell cannot enter the KB. What the gate does NOT verify is ATTRIBUTION: the quote is real but its subject may be class-level or a pronoun ('these methods', 'they') rather than the named method, so tying a receipt to one specific method is sometimes an inference. No end-to-end precision number has been measured |