EmidLabs Backtest
Run crypto trading strategy backtests through EmidLabs's Backtesting API.
Community: Submitted by a user or imported; check the owner before granting accessOnlineNo sign-inGlobalFreeRead-only
What it can do
What data it sees
Do you need an account
No: the server works without sign-in
Run crypto trading strategy backtests through EmidLabs's Backtesting API.
Server tool list (9)
Raw names from tools/list. Only developers need these.
| submit_confirmation_source | Runs a strategy against historical data purely to produce a signal timeline used to confirm OTHER backtests — not a backtest itself. Walks the same candles and evaluates the same DSL as submit_backtest, but never simulates a position: no trade, no PnL, no WinRate/drawdown, none of that applies here, because this strategy is never meant to be traded on its own. Returns immediately with an id and status — call get_confirmation_source to check completion, then pass that id as a confirmationSources sourceId in submit_backtest (e.g. only count an XRP entry once a BTC-neutral confirmation source agrees). Costs the same capacity as a regular backtest of the same size — the compute is identical, it just skips trade simulation. |
| list_available_assets | Lists every asset pair with real historical data, each with its supported timeframes and the date range actually available. Optional to call — submit_backtest already returns a clear error (with the real available range) when an asset or date range doesn't have data, so this is for up-front exploration or for recovering from an "unknown asset" error, not a required step before every submit_backtest. |
| submit_backtest_batch | Submits ONE strategy against MANY asset pairs in a single call — the same backtest you'd get from calling submit_backtest once per asset, without needing dozens of round trips. Returns immediately with a batchId (pass it to get_backtest_batch_results to fetch every asset's outcome, paginated) plus the per-asset id/status assigned right away. Best-effort: one bad asset pair (unknown, or its date range outside coverage) shows up with an error in that item only — every other asset in the batch is unaffected. Optionally accepts confirmationSources, applied identically to every asset in the batch — see submit_backtest's own confirmationSources argument for the full semantics. |
| get_backtest_batch_results | Fetches every asset's outcome from a submit_backtest_batch call, paginated. By default (waitForCompletion: true) polls internally until every item in the batch is done — a cheap check, not one that pages through everything — so one call returns the finished page. Each item has the same aggregate metrics and recency fields (recentTradeCount/recentAvgPnlR/recentOutcomes) get_backtest_result returns for a single backtest, plus assetPair/status/error, so the single-result and batch-result shapes never drift apart. totalCount/completedCount/failedCount/pendingCount come back on every page, not just the last, so you can tell the batch is done from a single pageSize=1 call. |
| get_backtest_trades | Fetches the closed-trade list for a completed backtest, paginated and sortable — the trade-by-trade detail get_backtest_result deliberately omits. Only closed trades ever appear; a position still open when the backtest's date range ends isn't represented here or anywhere else. Example: sortBy="exitTime", sortDirection="desc", pageSize=5 for the most recently closed trades. |
| get_backtest_result | Fetches a submitted backtest by id. By default (waitForCompletion: true) polls internally until it finishes, so one call returns one final answer — no need to poll from the caller's side. Only aggregate metrics are returned here, no trade-by-trade detail — call get_backtest_trades for that (paginated, sortable). Fetching many results from the same submit_backtest_batch call? Use get_backtest_batch_results instead. |
| submit_backtest | Submits a strategy for backtesting against historical OHLCV data. Returns immediately with an id and status — call get_backtest_result to fetch the outcome once it finishes. Testing the same strategy against many assets? Use submit_backtest_batch instead — one call per asset here adds up fast. Optionally accepts confirmationSources to only count a candidate Entry/Exit as a real trade once corroborated by a submit_confirmation_source result (multi-timeframe or cross-asset confirmation) — see the confirmationSources argument and submit_confirmation_source's own description. |
| get_confirmation_source | Fetches a submitted confirmation source by id. By default (waitForCompletion: true) polls internally until it finishes, so one call returns one final answer. No trade-outcome fields here at all (no PnlR/WinRate/...) — a confirmation source never opens a position. Once Completed, its id can be used as a confirmationSources sourceId in submit_backtest; its raw signal timeline is available separately via get_confirmation_source_signals. |
| get_confirmation_source_signals | Fetches a completed confirmation source's raw signal timeline, paginated — the actual data a backtest's confirmationSources requirement is checked against. Can easily run into the thousands for a frequent condition over a long range (every candle-condition match is a row, not just closed trades), which is why this is paginated from the start. Debugging/inspection only — you do NOT need this tool to make confirmationSources work, and should not fetch these rows to reconstruct the gating yourself. To actually gate a backtest by this source, pass its id directly as sourceId in submit_backtest's own confirmationSources array; the backend applies the backward-only state check against this exact timeline automatically, including the higher-timeframe-to-lower-timeframe alignment. Reimplementing that alignment by hand from this raw data is unnecessary and easy to get wrong (e.g. failing to correctly persist a higher-timeframe state across every lower-timeframe candle until the next higher-timeframe close). Use this tool only to sanity-check a source's signal density or diagnose an unexpectedly low ConfirmedSignalsCount after the fact. |