
case-doha-record
Search 30,000+ decided U.S.
What it can do
What data it sees
Do you need an account
No: the server works without sign-in
Search 30,000+ decided U.S. DOHA security-clearance decisions, cited to the public record.
How to connect
How to connect case-doha-record to Claude
The server address to paste into Claude settings:
https://www.clearancesearchengine.com/api/mcp
- Open Claude (claude.ai or the desktop app).
- Go to Settings → Connectors.
- Click Add custom connector.
- Paste the server address copied below into Remote MCP server URL and click Add.
- In a chat, click + → Connectors and switch the new connector on.
Custom connectors are available on Free, Pro, Max, Team and Enterprise plans (Free is limited to one). On Team and Enterprise an organization Owner adds the connector first under Organization settings → Connectors.
Authorization
After you click Add, a sign-in window for the service opens. Sign in with your own account and approve access. Claude never sees your password.
How to connect case-doha-record to ChatGPT
The server address to paste into ChatGPT settings:
https://www.clearancesearchengine.com/api/mcp
- Open ChatGPT in a browser (chatgpt.com). A Plus, Pro, Business, Enterprise or Edu plan is required.
- Turn on developer mode once: Settings → Apps → Advanced settings → Developer mode.
- Open Settings → Connectors and click Create.
- Fill in the form: Name (anything), Description (one line about what the service does), MCP server URL (copy it below).
- Under Authentication choose OAuth if the service requires sign-in, otherwise None. Click Create.
- In a new chat open + → Apps/Connectors and enable the connector.
OpenAI has renamed this section before (Connectors → Apps/Plugins). If the label differs, search settings for "developer mode". On Business/Enterprise workspaces an admin must allow custom connectors first.
Authorization
On first use ChatGPT opens the service's sign-in window. Sign in and approve access.
How to connect case-doha-record to Cursor
The server address to paste into Cursor settings:
https://www.clearancesearchengine.com/api/mcp
Fastest: click Open in Cursor below and confirm the prompt.
Manually:
- In Cursor open Settings → Cursor Settings → MCP and click Add new global MCP server.
- Paste the JSON copied below into
~/.cursor/mcp.json(per project:.cursor/mcp.jsonin the repo root). - Save the file. The server appears in the MCP list; authorize it there if asked.
Authorization
If the service needs sign-in, an authorize button appears next to the server in the MCP list.
Server tool list (7)
Raw names from tools/list. Only developers need these.
| search_cases | Search 30,000+ decided public DOHA security-clearance decisions (1996 to present). Full-text query plus filters. Returns matching cases with outcome, date, guidelines, and a citable URL each. |
| get_case | Fetch one decided DOHA case in full: what was alleged, the judge's findings per allegation, per-guideline formal findings, outcome, judge, representation, and appeal history. Use case_id from search_cases. |
| similar_cases | The most similar decided cases to a given case, ranked by how alike the ALLEGATIONS read (never by outcome). Same list shown on the case page. |
| get_statistics | Grant/denial statistics over decided hearing-level DOHA cases, grouped by year or by guideline, always with sample sizes. Same population rules as the site's Insights page. |
| get_timelines | Measured DOHA timelines: median days from Statement of Reasons to hearing and to decision, from dates stated in the decisions themselves. Optionally scoped to one decision year. |
| get_conduct_recency | How much time had passed between the most recent conduct and the decision, measured from dates stated in the decisions, for the incident-type concerns (drugs, alcohol, criminal conduct, sexual behavior, protected information, IT misuse). Reports median years before favorable vs unfavorable decisions, with counts. Descriptive association, never a prediction. |
| get_candor_outcomes | How cases with a candor allegation (falsification, omission, or lack of candor) were resolved in the decided record: the favorable rate with vs without such an allegation, when the judge found a deliberate falsification vs when the applicant rebutted it, and when the applicant corrected the record before being confronted. Counts and denominators throughout. Descriptive, never a prediction. |